Anybody who reads the Peter is the Wolf discussion forum has probably noticed the somewhat heated discussion between me and couple of other folks about whether certain characters should be considered 'evil' or not. I thought I'd lay down some of my own beliefs on the matter and get perspective from the rest of you about them.
First of all: I don't care about thoughts and intentions. I only care about actions. Bad intentions don't get people murdered or raped. Murder and rape gets people murdered and raped. Any and all good intentions that ultimately lead to people getting murdered, raped or robbed shouldn't really make the crime any less evil. If some psychotic homophobe kills my sister, him thinking his own actions were justified in the eyes of god whoever isn't going to give me any consolation. I suppose I can't say the same for people who just don't know any better and get manipulated into doing evil things by someone else. That's really what this debate is all about isn't it? It's easy to hate people like Joseph Stalin or Tomás de Torquemada but it's not so easy to hate the mentally handicapped person tricked into shooting someone they didn't even know. The werewolf hunters like Lee and Papa Stebbins (I don't know his real name) are aware enough of what they're doing that they're actually choosing to kill people of their own will. To me, that's enough to label them as evil, good intentions be damned.
Kris, you said that true evil is defined by the presence of greed. I disagree. Greed, in and of itself, isn't really an evil thing. I think George Carlin said it best, "Coveting your neighbor's goods is what keeps the economy going. Your neighbor gets a vibrator that plays Oh Come All Ye Faithful and you'll want to get one, too." What exactly is wrong with wanting to acquire stuff for personal satisfaction? That doesn't automatically mean that you'll resort to skulduggery to get it, it's something that can motivate you to work harder. This is the primary reason I'm not a Democrat, by the way.
As for saying that Juniper is slanted more towards evil than Lee? Sorry, but nope. Lee openly wants to murder people. Juniper does not. Perhaps I need to offer a bit more perspective. In case it wasn't apparent from my sig, I am an atheist. Since conscious existence ends with your death, murder is the worst crime you can do to someone. That shifts Lee and his father straight to the maximum evil rating in my eyes. What does Juniper ultimately want to do? Become a werewolf herself. Sure, she's not considering any consequences of this idea and we're still not sure what she's willing to do to get there, but whatever she does could only, at most, make her as bad as Lee, not worse. Best case scenario: she becomes a thrall and nothing else happens. Worst case scenario: she loses too much control and someone innocent ends up dead by her hands.
I mentioned that from what we know so far I view Papa Stebbins as being a greater monster than even Gus Cramer. Stebbins wants genocide, flat out plain and simple. Has Cramer ever even actually killed anyone? Even if he has, no way is it more than Stebbins. I know what people are gonna say next, "Cramer raped his own daughter you dickhead!" Yes he did, and that makes him enough of a threat to society to need removing from it, but not as severely as Stebbins. I know people are gonna hate me for saying this, but murder is a worse crime than rape. Rape is a horrible horrible crime, I'm not disputing that, but at least rape victims are able to continue living out their lives. You can't ask murder victims how they're coping with their murder, BECAUSE THEY ARE DEAD.
I'm also not an unconditional side taker. I don't automatically agree with other atheists just because they're atheists. I don't automatically disagree with christians just because they're christians. One of my best friends is a christian who tries to raise money for his church through cookouts and such. Even though I dislike Christianity and would rather see it gone, I still support what he does because he's doing productive things. Conversely, if an atheist friend or family member ever sets fire to a church I wouldn't hesitate to turn them in. The church is there because someone wants it there and went to a lot of effort for it. Religion isn't fought by destroying physical things.